Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010051252025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/570/2025 RACHIT PRADIP SARAF AND 3 ORS. S/O- PRADAIP SARAF, R/O- F 811, SURYA PALACE, NEAR NAVMANGLAM APARTMENT, CITY LIGHT, SVR COLLEGE, SURAT 395007, GUJARAT PRESENT RESIDENT ADDRESS- E-BLOCK, 5A, SUBHAM BUIL WELL, SHREE NAGAR, GUWAHATI, KAMRUP (M), ASSAM-781006 2: ROHIT PRADEEP SARAF S/O PRADEEP SARAF R/O- F 811 SURYA PALACE NEAR NAVMANGLAM APARTMENT CITY LIGHT SVR COLLEGE SURAT 395007 GUJARAT PRESENT RESIDENT ADDRESS- E-BLOCK 5A SUBHAM BUIL WELL SHREE NAGAR GUWAHATI KAMRUP (M) ASSAM-781006 3: INDU SARAF @ INDU PRADIP SARAF W/O PRADIP SARAF R/O- F 811 SURYA PALACE NEAR NAVMANGLAM APARTMENT CITY LIGHT SVR COLLEGE Page No.# 2/3 SURAT 395007 GUJARAT PRESENT RESIDENT ADDRESS- E-BLOCK 5A SUBHAM BUIL WELL SHREE NAGAR GUWAHATI KAMRUP (M) ASSAM-781006 4: PRADEEP KUMAR SARAF S/O RAM PRASAD SARAF R/O- F 811 SURYA PALACE NEAR NAVMANGLAM APARTMENT CITY LIGHT SVR COLLEGE SURAT 395007 GUJARAT PRESENT RESIDENT ADDRESS- E-BLOCK 5A SUBHAM BUIL WELL SHREE NAGAR GUWAHATI KAMRUP (M) ASSAM-78100 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR A NATH, MS. R JUGLI,MS M PARBIN,DR ANKIT TODI Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER Date : 27.05.2025 Heard Mr. A Nath, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. K K Parasar, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State of Assam. 2. This is an application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023, praying for grant of pre- arrest bail in respect of Garchuk P.S. Case No. 54/2025. 3. On 13.03.2025, the petitioners were granted interim bail and they were directed to appear before the Investigating Officer. Accordingly, the petitioners had appeared before the Investigating Officer and their statements had already been recorded. 4. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel of both sides. 5. Since the petitioners are co-operating with the Investigating Officer, they do not deserve to be detained in custody. Therefore, their anticipatory bail application is allowed. 6. The interim bail granted on 13.03.2025 in favour of the petitioners is hereby made absolute. With the aforesaid direction, the present anticipatory bail application stands disposed of accordingly. JUDGE Comparing Assistant