HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 31237 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Mukesh Tiwari, learned counsel for respondent no. 1 and perused the record. 2. The present petition has been filed challenging the order dated 11.07.2025 passed by the Recovery Officer-II, Debt Recovery Tribunal, Allahabad in DRC No. 112 of 2024 (Punjab National Bank v. M/s Jail Bajrangbali Trading Co. & others). 3. Learned counsel for the respondent has raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner has an alternative remedy of filing appeal against the order impugned. 4. Since the petitioner has an alternative remedy, I am not inclined to entertain the instant petition. 5. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy as available to him under law. 6. Certified copy of the orders, if any, be returned to learned counsel for the petitioner after retaining photo copy of the same. September 9, 2025 Ved Prakash Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dev Kant Trigunait Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ramesh Kumar Shukla (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Govind Sahu .....Petitioner(s) Punjab National Bank And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad