Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 90438 (ALL)

M/S. CHANNA ENTERPRISES v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/30525/2025 · 2025-09-24

Anish Kumar Gupta, Mahesh Chandra Tripathi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 30525 of 2025 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J. 1. Heard Sri Manoj Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Akhileshwar Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing for the State respondents and Sri Kaushalendra Nath Singh, learned counsel for the Noida Authority. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking a direction commanding the respondents no. 2 and 3 to provide the benefit of one time lease rent scheme to the petitioner and issue the final calculation of amount after excluding the interest. Alternatively, it is prayed that the representation of the petitioner dated 2.7.2025 be decided expeditiously within a month. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner on instruction states that the petitioner is ready to clear the outstanding lease rent and prays that the representation dated 2.7.2025 be decided. 4. Per contra, Sri Kaushalendra Nath Singh, learned counsel for the Noida Authority raised an objection and submits that as per the notice dated 24.12.2024 the outstanding amount qua the lease rent against the petitioner was Rs. 79,02,200/-. He submits that in absence of payment of previous lease rent deposit, the relief as prayed for is wholly misconceived. But in case the petitioner clears the outstanding amount, definitely the relief for one time lease rent can be considered as per the policy. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manoj Kumar Mishra, Rahul Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Kaushalendra Nath Singh M/S. Channa Enterprises .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) any opinion on merits of the issue involved, with the consent of parties herein, the writ petition stands disposed of with observation that in case the petitioner deposits the entire outstanding of lease rent within a month and thereafter, apply for one time lease rent scheme, the same shall be considered and decided by the second respondent in accordance with law, expeditiously. September 25, 2025/Kirti WRIC No. 30525 of 2025 2 (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Digitally signed by :- SMT KIRTI MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad