Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 90437 (PNJ)

REKHA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRWP/8744/2025 · 2025-08-18

Subhas Mehla

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

131 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-8744-2025 Date of decision: 18.08.2025 REKHA AND ANOTHER ...Petitioners VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Mr. Kapil Khanna, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Karan Veer Singh, Sr. DAG, Haryana. ***** SUBHAS MEHLA , J. (Oral) 1. Prayer in the instant criminal writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for directing respondents No.2 & 3 to take action on the representation dated 08.08.2025 (Annexure P-3) for protecting the life and liberty of the petitioners and not to interfere in their peaceful lives at the behest of private respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are major and are living together. They are into live-in-relationship against the wishes of respondents No.4 to 7, who are extending threats to cause harm to the petitioners and in this regard they gave representation dated 08.08.2025 (Annexure P-3) to respondent No.2 i.e. Superintendent of Police, Karnal. 3. Notice of motion. Priyanka Thakur 2025.08.21 18:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 4. Mr. Karan Veer Singh, Sr. DAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the State and submits that on the representation of the petitioners, the statement of respondents have already been recorded. Learned State counsel has produced the copy of statements of Pala Ram, Rajesh and Sandeep, which are taken on record. They stated that there is no threat perception to the petitioners from their side. 5. Faced with this situation, counsel for the petitioners submitted that he be permitted to withdraw the present petition at this stage with liberty to avail his remedies in accordance with law, if any need arise. 6. In light of the above, the present petition is hereby dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. (SUBHAS MEHLA) 18.08.2025 JUDGE Priyanka Thakur Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes No Whether Reportable : Yes No Priyanka Thakur 2025.08.21 18:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document