- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45766 RP No.555 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH REVIEW PETITION NO.555 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. SRI A. ASHWATH KUMAR S/O R. ANANDA RAMA REDDY AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS R/AT NO.144 OPP. GANESHA TEMPLE PARAPPANA AGRAHARA BENGALURU-560100. 2. SRI A VIJAYA KUMAR S/O R ANANDA RAMA REDDY AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS R/AT NO.120 OPP. GANESHA TEMPLE PARAPPANA AGRAHARA BENGALURU-560100. 3. SRI. SANJAYA A S/O R ANANDA RAMA REDDY AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/AT NO.13 AND 14/1 MANO FELICITY 1ST CROSS (OLD 8TH CROSS) PARAPPANA AGRAHARA BENGALURU-560100. 4. SRI A ASHOK KUMAR S/O R ANANDA RAMA REDDY AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/AT NO.116/3A SGR COLLEGE ROAD Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45766 RP No.555 of 2024 VEERAPPA REDDY LAYOUT MUNNEKOLALA BENGALURU -560037. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. JYOTHI S.K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. C. BABU S/O CHINNAPPA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/AT NO.990/729, 13TH CROSS, NEAR BUS STAND, CHENNAKESHAVA NAGARA, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK, BENGALURU - 560100. 2. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LAND REVENUE, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001. 3. THE TAHASILDAR BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK, K G ROAD, BENGALURU - 560009. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR, AGA ) THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLVII RULE 1 OF CPC, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 24.06.2024 PASSED IN WRIT PETITION NO.16113 AT ANNEXURE N. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45766 RP No.555 of 2024 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. Compliance of office objections is over-ruled. 2. Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondent Nos.2 and 3. 3. Having taken note of the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.16113/2024 dated 24.06.2024, wherein a direction was issued to the respondent - Tahsildar to consider the representation made by the petitioner therein, I am of the view that, there is no error apparent on the face of the record. 4. Accordingly, the Review Petition is dismissed. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1