Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 90422 (PNJ)

JAI PARKASH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/23461/2025 · 2025-08-13

Tribhuvan Dahiya

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-23461-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 132 JAI PARKASH AND OTHERS STATE OF HARYANA AND CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present:- Dr. Maha Singh Sindhu Mr. Nishant Sindhu, Advocate for the petitioner TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA The mandamus directing the respondents to their juniors with effect from the date 04.08.2021. 2. Learned counsel for the herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this stage, the petitioner decide the pending specified period. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Mr. Amit Sahni, Additional Advocate General, Haryana notice on behalf of the respondents notice, dated 09.05.2025 Secondary Education with law within 2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of Decision: JAI PARKASH AND OTHERS Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Dr. Maha Singh Sindhu, Advocate Mr. Nishant Sindhu, Advocate for the petitioners. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) The petition has been filed, inter alia directing the respondents to step-up the petitioners’ pay with effect from the date of their promotion as Principal, i.e., Learned counsel for the petitioner herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this petitioner will be satisfied in case pending legal notice, dated 09.05.2025 specified period. Notice of motion. Mr. Amit Sahni, Additional Advocate General, Haryana notice on behalf of the respondents/State and 09.05.2025, will be decided by Education, by passing a speaking with law within a period of three months. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-23461-2025 Date of Decision: 13.08.2025 …Petitioner(s) …Respondent(s) TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA , Advocate with inter alia, seeking a writ of up the petitioners’ pay at par with of their promotion as Principal, i.e., petitioners submits that grievance raised herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this atisfied in case third respondent is directed to 09.05.2025, Annexure P-8, in a Mr. Amit Sahni, Additional Advocate General, Haryana, accepts and submits that the pending legal will be decided by the third respondent/Director, by passing a speaking/reasoned order in accordance seeking a writ of at par with of their promotion as Principal, i.e., submits that grievance raised herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this is directed to , in a accepts legal Director, order in accordance Aman Dua 2025.08.18 14:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document CWP-23461-2025 5. In view of the statement made, lea has no objection to the petition being disposed o 6. Ordered accordingly. 7. In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the officer concerned shall pay costs of 13.08.2025 Ad 2025 -2- In view of the statement made, lea has no objection to the petition being disposed o Ordered accordingly. In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the r concerned shall pay costs of ₹50,000 to the petitioner Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioners has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the ,000 to the petitioners. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No s In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the ) Aman Dua 2025.08.18 14:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document