SRI. ABDUL SATTAR UMAR KACHHI v. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR
WP/33346/2025 · 2025-11-10
Suraj Govindaraj
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 90406 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 90406 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45562 WP No. 33346 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 33346 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. ABDUL SATTAR UMAR KACHHI S/O UMAR IBRAHIM KACHHI, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, THE PRESIDENT HARZRATH KAHALANDAR SHAH PEER WALIULLAH ARABIC COLLEGE TURST ® JAVAGAL , ARASIKERE TALUK HASSAN DIST - 573125 SENIOR CITIZEN NOT CLAIMED …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHRIDHAR NARAYAN HEGDE.,ADV.,) AND:
1.
THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR REGISTRAR OF SOCIETIES AND REGISTRAR OF FIRMS C B MALLEGOWDA COMPLEX M G ROAD CROSS, CHIKMAGALUR- 577 101.
2.
THE SUB-REGISTRAR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR 1ST FLOOR, MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA MUDIGERE, MUDIGERE TALUK CHIKMAGALUR DIST - 577132. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SARITHA KULKARNI, AGA)
Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45562 WP No. 33346 of 2025
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.1 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DTD 15.09.25 MADE BY THE PETITIONER AT ANNEXURE - C AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
ORAL ORDER
1. Learned AGA accepts notice for respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
2. Petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:
"WHEREFORE, the Petitioner respectfully prays that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to: i) Issue a writ of mandamus, direction, directing the respondent No.1 to consider the representation dated 15.09.2025 made by the petitioner at Annexure C, ii) Pass any other order or direction as this Hon'ble Court deemed fit to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of Justice and equity."
3. By way of representation dated 15.09.2025 at Annexure C, the petitioner is contending that there
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45562 WP No. 33346 of 2025
was a forged resolution and fabricated document, which is sought for is that respondent No.1 to exercise powers under Section 22C of the Karnataka Registration (Amendment) Act, 2024 and pass necessary orders.
4. The petitioner is before this Court contending that no action has been taken in relation thereto. A complaint has been filed under Section 22C which was required for respondent No. 1 to consider the same and pass necessary orders either accepting or rejecting the complaint filed.
5. Neither has been done and therefore, I pass the following:-
ORDER i. Writ petition is allowed. ii. Respondent no. 1 is directed to consider the complaint dated 15.09.2025 at Annexure -C and pass the necessary
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45562 WP No. 33346 of 2025
orders in accordance with law, within a period of 4 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. iii. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the entitlement of the petitioner.
SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE
BSV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 41