HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 29838 of 2025 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. Heard Sri Arun Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Rajni Ojha, learned counsel for the U.P.S.R.T.C/respondent No.2. 2. The petitioner has preferred th present petition with the prayer to quash the order dated 24.04.2025 passed by Employee's Compensation Commissioners on the application dated 23.12.2024 in Case No. ECA 55 of 2023 (Sri Subodh Kumar Vs. M/s Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation and others). 3. After some arguments, learned counsel confined his prayer to the extent to direct the Court below, before whom the aforesaid case is pending, to decide the aforesaid case expeditiously. 4. This prayer has not been opposed by learned counsel for the respondent No.2. 5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 6. In view of the order proposed to be passed herein, no useful purpose would be served by putting the private respondent to notice and keeping this petition pending before this Court. However, in case the private respondent feels aggrieved by the order his/her right to seek modification/variation of the order is being kept reserved. 7. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the present petition is disposed of directing the Court below, before whom the aforesaid case is pending to decide the aforesaid case expeditiously but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to any of the parties unless there is no legal impediment. (Prakash Padia,J.) September 8, 2025 saqlain Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arun Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : Rajni Ojha M/S The Oriental Insurance Company Limited .....Petitioner(s) Sri Subodh Kumar And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SYED MOHAMMAD SAQLAIN HAIDER High Court of Judicature at Allahabad