Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9039 (CHH)

SMT. LAXMI THAKUR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/1461/2023 · 2025-08-12

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1461 of 2023 1 - Smt. Laxmi Thakur W/o Narendra Kumar Thakur Aged About 40 Years At Present Working And Posted As Assistant Development Extension Officer, Janpad Panchayat Gurur, District Balod Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Additional Development Commissioner Development Commission Office, Indrawati Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - Development Commissioner Of The Office Of The Development Commissioner Vikas Bhawan, 4th Floor, Sector-19, North Block, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Additional Chief Secretary Chhattisgarh Panchayat And Gramin Vikas Vibhag, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 5 - Tajeswhar Prasad Yadav S/o Puni Lal Yadav Aged About 43 Years R/o Swastik Bhawan, Anjani Vihar, Science College Road, Chantidih, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 6 - Ashish Kumar Jaiswal S/o Ramesh Kumar Jaiswal Aged About 35 Years R/o Panchayat Training Centre, Nutan Chowk, Sarkanda, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 7 - Ashish Keshwarwani S/o Ramkumar Kesharwani Aged About 35 Years Posted At Kshetriya Panchayat Evam Gramin Vikas Parshikshan Kndra Bilaspur District Bilaspur (C.G.) 8 - Jaswant Singh Jangde S/o Ghansyam Jangde Aged About 35 Years R/o Village Bakarkuda, Post Tikari, Police Station Masturi, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 9 - Nitu Sahu D/o Natthu Lal Sahu Aged About 42 Years R/o Rajiv Vihar, Vip City, Phase-2, Plot No. 8, Bilaspur (C.G.) Digitally signed by SHAYNA KADRI 2 10 - Piyush Singh Thakur S/o Ghanshyam Singh Thakur Aged About 38 Years R/o Adarsh Nagar, Kawardha, District Kabirdham (C.G.) 11 - Keshaw Kumar Sahu S/o Kashiram Sahu Aged About 40 Years R/o Village Mohatara Khurd, Tahsil Pandariya, District Kabirdham (C.G.) 12 - Shiv Kumar Sahu S/o Late Radhe Lal Sahu Aged About 48 Years R/o Village Bampata, Post Newaspur, Block Mungeli, District Mungeli (C.G.) 13 - Sunil Kumar Tiwari S/o Balram Ji Tiwari Aged About 37 Years R/o Ganga Nagar Phase-2, Mangla, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 14 - Khagesh Kumar Nirmalkar S/o Panchram Nirmalkar Aged About 46 Years R/o Nagar Panchayat Baloda, Post Baloda, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 15 - Bhopendra Kumar Patel S/o Sharavan Kumar Patel Aged About 34 Years R/o Patliputra Nagar, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 16 - Rooplata Bunkar W/o Rohit Sharma Aged About 36 Years R/o House No. B/47, Garden City, Mopka, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 17 - Sandeep Kashyap S/o R.S. Kashyap Aged About 42 Years R/o Mahamaya Para, Jarhagaon, District Mungeli (C.G.) 18 - Krishna Singh Rajput S/o Sitaram Rajput Aged About 36 Years R/o Village Charbhatha, P.O. Kodwabani, Tahsil Mungeli, District Mungeli (C.G.) 19 - Santosh Kumar Ghosle S/o Itwari Ram Aged About 42 Years R/o Village Kodwabani, Tahsil Mungeli, District Mungeli (C.G.) 20 - Yugal Kishore Jagat S/o Sukhdev Singh Jagat Aged About 32 Years Nawapara (Saila) Post Pali, Tahsil Pali, District Korba (C.G.) 21 - Priyanka Dewangan W/o Amit Kumar Dewangan Aged About 36 Years R/o Ashok Vihar, Phase-Ii, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 22 - Jyotsna Vaishnav W/o Bhojesh Kumar Sahu Aged About 40 Years R/o House No. 1, Block-H/2, Housing Board Colony, Pali Korba, District Korba (C.G.) 23 - Manishankar Kaushik S/o Jeetram Kaushik Aged About 43 Years R/o Village Bartori, Block Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 24 - Deepti Tiwari D/o R.S. Dubey Aged About 39 Years R/o Nutan Colony, Sarkanda, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) (Cause Title is taken from CIS System) For Petitioner : None For respective respondents : Mr. Palash Tiwari, Advocate 3 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 13/08/2025 1. There is no appearance on behalf of the petitioner even when the matter is taken up for hearing in second round. 2. In view of the above, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss this writ petition for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Shayna Judge