BHUMIKA BHATI 2025.09.01 14:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh CWP-23480-2025 (O&M) -2- by the learned Appellate Authority, who is the Commissioner, Faridkot would show that on the face of it no reason has been mentioned therein and submitted that his limited prayer in the present petition is to set aside the aforesaid order (Annexure P-8) being totally non-speaking and the Appellate Authority may be directed to pass a fresh order backed by reasons. 3. At this stage, Mr. Vikas Sonak, learned AAG, Punjab has submitted that on the face of it the order passed by the Appellate Authority does not seem to be a reasoned order because no reason has been mentioned therein and therefore, he has no objection in case the aforesaid order (Annexure P-8) is set aside. 4. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances and on perusal of the impugned order dated 28.05.2025 (Annexure P-8) passed by the Appellate Authority i.e. the Commissioner, Faridkot, this Court is of the considered view that the aforesaid order (Annexure P-8) is a non-speaking order and not backed by any reason. Consequently, the present petition is allowed and the impunged order dated 28.05.2025 (Annexure P-8) is hereby set aside. The matter is remanded back to the Commissioner, Faridkot to pass a fresh order in accordance with law which is backed by reasons and also after giving due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner or his counsel. It is further directed that the fresh order will be passed by a fresh application of mind and the Appellate Authority shall not be influenced by any earlier order and also the order passed by this Court in the present petition. The needful be done within a period of three months from today. 27.08.2025 (JASGURPREET SINGH PURI) Bhumika JUDGE 1. Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No 2. Whether reportable: Yes/No BHUMIKA BHATI 2025.09.01 14:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh