- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44210 WP No. 14075 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 14075 OF 2023 (T-IT) BETWEEN: INFOSYS LIMITED, 44, INFOSYS AVENUE, ELECTRONIC CITY, HOSUR ROAD, BANGALORE – 560 100 A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956, REPRESENTED HEREIN BY ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE, MR. P. PRAKASH AGED 51 YEARS, (DIRECTOR) …PETITIONER (BY SRI. TANMAYEE RAJKUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX SPL.RANGE -3,BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU – 560 095 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 3(1)(1) (ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 3(1)(1)), BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU – 560 095 3. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU – 560 095 4. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX CENTRALIZED PROCESSING CENTER, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, Digitally signed by CHANDANA B M Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44210 WP No. 14075 of 2023 BENGALURU, KARNATAKA – 560 500 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.I. SANMATHI, ADVOCATE) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING REFUND OF THE AMOUNT OF RS 856,53,19,960/- BEING THE REFUNDS DETERMINED FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEARS 2017-18 AND 2018-19 INCORRECTLY ADJUSTED TOWARDS THE DEMAND OF AY 2016-17 ALONG WITH APPLICABLE INTEREST AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 25.10.2025, which reads as under: “The Advocate for the petitioner submits that the above writ petition has become infructuous and therefore seeks leave of this Hon’ble Court to withdraw the same. Therefore, it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to take the memo on record and dismiss the above petition as withdrawn, in the interests of justice and equity.” 2. The said memo is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as withdrawn in terms of the aforesaid memo. Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE BMC: List No.: 2 Sl No.: 18