CRM-M- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 113 SAVITA STATE OF CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: SURYA PRATAP SINGH 1. of directions to arising out of 324(4), 333, 351(3) of the issuance of directions to till date no report has been filed. 2. petitioner the respondent No. -44337-2025 8587 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PRATAP SINGH Mr. Naveen Kashyap, Advocate for the petitioner. SURYA PRATAP SINGH, J (ORAL) The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner directions to the respondent No.2 to transfer the investigation of arising out of FIR No.302 dated 23.05.2025 324(4), 333, 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita issuance of directions to the respondents No.3 and 4 to file status report as till date no report has been filed. The learned counsel representing the petitioner petitioner has filed a representation dated respondent No.3-Superintendent of Police, 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-44337-2025 DECIDED ON: 18.08.202 .....PETITIONER VERSUS .....RESPONDENT SURYA PRATAP SINGH , Advocate for the petitioner. as been filed by the petitioner for issuance to transfer the investigation of a case FIR No.302 dated 23.05.2025, under Sections 3(5), 303, Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and also for pondents No.3 and 4 to file status report as earned counsel representing the petitioner submits that the filed a representation dated 29.05.2025 (Annexure P-2) before endent of Police, Karnal. The learned counsel .2025 .....PETITIONER .....RESPONDENTS issuance a case under Sections 3(5), 303, , 2023 and also for pondents No.3 and 4 to file status report as submits that the ) before earned counsel GAURAV THAKUR 2025.08.19 15:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M- prays for directions to representation 3. 5. deciding the the case be given to disposed of 6. hereby disposed of with a direction to speaking order and 2) on the merits of the case receipt of copy of instant order observation of this Court with regar authorities shall be at liberty to draw their own conclusion without being influenced by the contents of instant order. Gaurav Thakur Whether Whether reportable -44337-2025 8587 prays for directions to the respondent No. representation on the merits of the case within a stipulated time. Notice of motion to the respondents No.1 to 3 only Mr. Parveen Kumar Aggarwal, Addl. A.G., Haryana Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that a direction for deciding the representation of the petitioner be given to the respondent No. disposed of accordingly. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to ing order and decide the representation on the merits of the case within a period of 15 days from receipt of copy of instant order. However, it is made clear that there is no observation of this Court with regard to merits of the case and the police authorities shall be at liberty to draw their own conclusion without being influenced by the contents of instant order. Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No 2 respondent No.3 to decide the abovementioned within a stipulated time. respondents No.1 to 3 only. Parveen Kumar Aggarwal, Addl. A.G., Haryana Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that a direction for of the petitioner (Annexure P-2) on the merits of respondent No.3 and that the instant petition be Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.3 to pass a decide the representation of the petitioner (Annexure P within a period of 15 days from the date of However, it is made clear that there is no d to merits of the case and the police authorities shall be at liberty to draw their own conclusion without being influenced by the contents of instant order. :Yes/No : Yes/No to decide the abovementioned Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that a direction for on the merits of the instant petition be Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present petition is pass a (Annexure P- the date of However, it is made clear that there is no d to merits of the case and the police authorities shall be at liberty to draw their own conclusion without being GAURAV THAKUR 2025.08.19 15:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document