Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 90302 (PNJ)

RAMESH KUMAR v. SANDEEP SAHARAN

CRM-A/1047/2016 · 2025-07-21

Sandeep Moudgil

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 257 CRM-A-1047-MA-2016 (O&M) Decided on 21.07.2025 **** Ramesh Kumar ... Applicant(s) VS. Sandeep Saharan ... Respondent(s) **** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL **** Present: Mr. Rohit Kaushik, Advocate – amicus curiae **** Sandeep Moudgil, J. CRM-17081-2016 For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and the delay of 27 days in filing the present application is hereby condoned. CRM stands disposed of. Main case 1. The present application has been preferred under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter ‘CR.P.C.’) seeking grant of leave to appeal the judgment of acquittal dated 18.02.2016 passed by the learned JMIC, Kaithal in a case stemming from complaint dated 12.09.2011/23.04.2012 filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter ‘NI Act’). 2. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in M/s Celestium Financial vs. A. Gnanasekaran Etc., 2025(3) RCR (Criminal) 208, after considerable discussion and comparative interpretation of Sections 372 and 378(4) of Cr.P.C., concluded that the victim has a right to file an appeal under Section 372 of Cr.P.C. before the Court of Sessions. V VISHAL SHONKAR 2025.07.24 10:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 257-CRM-A-1047-MA-2016 2 3. Therefore, in view of the judgment rendered by the Apex Court in Celestium Financial (supra), the present application seeking leave to appeal is remanded back to the learned Sessions Judge, Kaithal with a direction to treat the same as filed under Section 372 of the Cr.P.C. and entrust it to appropriate Court for its disposal. 4. The Registry is directed to send the complete paper-book and the record of the case to the learned Sessions Judge, Kaithal forthwith. 5. Disposed of accordingly. 6. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of. 21.07.2025 V.Vishal (Sandeep Moudgil) Judge Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No V VISHAL SHONKAR 2025.07.24 10:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document