Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 90297 (ALL)

RAJKUMAR TYAGI v. THE STATE OF UP AND 5 OTHERS

WRIC/30766/2025 · 2025-09-03

Arun Kumar, Manoj Kumar Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 30766 of 2025 Court No. - 21 HON'BLE MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, J. HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J. 1. The writ petition has been filed praying for direction to respondents No. 2 to 6 to decide the representation filed by the petitioner. The representation is dated 19.08.2025 and wherein the petitioner has alleged that the Bridge Corporation is constructing a railway flyover which is affecting land of large number of farmers including the petitioner. It is alleged that an old well situated over the land of the petitioner is also getting affected. In the representation, prayer has been made to redress the grievance in relation to the old well and construction of the flyover. 2. The writ petition does not indicate that whether the land over which the bridge is being constructed has been acquired or not. The averments are wholly vague. There is also no evidence as to who is constructing the flyover and under whose order. 3. In such view of the matter, we decline to issue any direction and leave it open to the petitioner to seek redressal in such other manner as may be advised. 4. The petition stands disposed of. September 4, 2025 Mukesh Kr. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ahamad Farhan, Haya Rizvi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Arun Kumar,J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.) Rajkumar Tyagi .....Petitioner(s) The State Of Up And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MUKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad