Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 90290 (KAR)

SATISH G N v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/14342/2022 · 2025-11-13

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46221 WP No. 14342 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 14342 OF 2022 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SATISH G N S/O. NANJUNDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS NO. 2, 1ST FLOOR, SHOPPING STREET, KUMARA PARK WEST, SESHADRIPURAM, SERPENTINE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAKESH B. BHATT, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46221 WP No. 14342 of 2022 3. DEPUTY SECRETARY-1 URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIKAS SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001. 4. UNDER SECRETARY AND PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIKAS SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001. 5. THE KARNATAKA STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION "MAHITI SOUDHA", NO. 104, 1ST FLOOR, DEVARAJ URS ROAD, INFRONT OF VIKAS SOUDHA WEST GATE-2, BENGALURU-560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR, AGA FOR R1 TO R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 07.03.2022 PASSED Ka Ma A 9780 APL 2021 BY THE R-5 ANNEXURE-E IN SO FAR NOT GIVING TIME BOUND DIRECTION TO THE R-3 AND 4 TO FURNISH THE INFORMATION SOUGHT BY THE PETITIONERS AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46221 WP No. 14342 of 2022 ORAL ORDER In this writ petition, the petitioner has sought for direction to respondent No.5 to provide time bound direction to furnish the information sought for by the petitioner. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 3. Taking into consideration, particularly, Annexure- E, dated 07.03.2022 by the respondent No.5- The Karnataka State Information Commission (for short, 'Commission'), wherein, it is open for the petitioner to approach the respondent No.5-Commission seeking further order. Hence, no interference is called for in this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition disposed of reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach the respondent No.5-Commission, in accordance with law. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB: List No.: 1 Sl No.: 22