AMIT KHOYA ALIAS PANDEYA MUNDA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./3005/2025 · 2025-04-16
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9027 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9027 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2025:JHHC:11499 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.3005 of 2025
------ Amit Khoya @ Pandeya Munda, S/o Joto Munda @ Joto Pahan, aged about 22 years, R/o-Village-Manhu, P.O. & P.S.-Khunti, Dist.- Khunti, Jharkhand.
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Vishal Kr. Rai, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Sardhu Mahto, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated- 16-04-2025
Heard the parties.
Learned counsel for the petitioner files a supplementary affidavit. Keep the same in the record.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Karra P.S. Case No.27 of 2024 corresponding to S.T. Case No.19 of 2025 registered under Sections 323, 341, 364, 384, 385, 395 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 27 of the Arms Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has abducted the informant and Dilip Kumar Mahto for demanding ransom. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para-03 of the supplementary affidavit. It is next submitted that the charge has been framed against the petitioner and the charge sheet has been submitted in this case. It is next submitted that the co-accused person has already been released on bail by a co-ordinate bench of this Court vide order dated 26.09.2024 in B.A. No.8491 of 2024. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co- operate with the trial of the case. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Khunti in connection with Karra P.S. Case No.27 of 2024 corresponding to S.T. Case No.19 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant during the pendency of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Abhiraj/