Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 90252 (PNJ)

MANVIR KAUR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/8693/2025 · 2025-08-13

Subhas Mehla

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-8693-2025 1 109 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-8693-2025 Date of decision: 13.08.2025 MANVIR KAUR AND ANOTHER ....Petitioners Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Mr. Aanand Kumar Maurya, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Ravinder Singh, Deputy A.G., Punjab. **** SUBHAS MEHLA , J (Oral): 1. The prayer in the instant criminal writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is for the issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondents No.4 to 9 who are harassing and threatening them and their family members. 2. In this regard, this Court has already given the directions in Asha and another vs. State of Haryana and another, CWP No.6717 of 2009, decided on 25.07.2012 and in compliance of the same, the State Government had taken steps to protect the life and liberty of run away couple. 3. Apart from that the State of Punjab vide notification dated 23.01.2025 also notified the SOPs for the protection of life and liberty of the petitioners in similar situations, in compliance of the Criminal Writ Petition No.12562 of 2023 titled as “Kajal Vs. State of Haryana and others”. MONIKA RANI 2025.08.18 10:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-8693-2025 2 4. In the light of the above directions, the petitioners are directed to approach the concerned authorities. 5. Disposed of. (SUBHAS MEHLA) JUDGE 13.08.2025 monika 1. Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes /No 2. Whether reportable : Yes /No MONIKA RANI 2025.08.18 10:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document