Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 90248 (PNJ)

SOKIN v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRWP/8669/2025 · 2025-08-21

Jasjit Singh Bedi

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

236 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-8669-2025 Date of decision :21.08.2025 SOKIN ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Khalid Tauru, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. T.P. Singh, Sr. DAG, Haryana. Mr. Sanawar Ali, Advocate for respondent No.5. **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (ORAL) The prayer in the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is for issuance of a writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus and for issuance of directions to respondent Nos.2 to 4 to trace the detenue namely Varseena from the illegal custody of respondent Nos.5 to 11. Mr. Sanawar Ali, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of respondent No.5 and has filed his Vakalatnama. The same is taken on record. A status report dated 20.08.2025 by way of an affidavit of Prithvi Singh, HPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Nuh has been filed on behalf of the State by the learned counsel for the State. The same is taken on record. A perusal of the reply would reveal that the petitioner was in a live in-relationship with Varseena and on getting to know that he JITESH LAL 2025.08.22 13:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-8669-2025 -2- was already married to someone else, Varseena has gone back to her parents and is residing happily with them. The statement of the alleged detenue namely Varseena is attached as Annexure R-2 to the reply. In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed by this Court. Disposed of. (JASJIT SINGH BEDI) JUDGE 21.08.2025 JITESH Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No JITESH LAL 2025.08.22 13:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document