HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 30755 of 2025 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. 1. After arguing at some length, on merit of the case, Sri R.K.Ojha, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has made innocuous prayer that the respondent no. 3 may decide the representation of the petitioner revoking the suspension on the ground that the discrepancies which have been mentioned in the order dated 17.05.2022 have already been removed by the petitioners and are of no existence. It is also submitted that the petitioners have represented their case on 21.06.2022 which is appended as annexure 11 to the writ petition. 2. Per contra, Sri Pranav Mishra, learned counsel for the respondent no. 3 vehemently opposed the writ petition on merit and submitted that there are certain discrepancies in the petitioners institution, therefore the order dated 17.05.2022 has been passed by the Registrar. Learned counsel for the respondent no. 3 further submitted that he has no objection, if the petitioners institution has taken care of all the objections raised by the Registrar at the time of passing of the impugned order dated 17.05.2022 and the petitioners may be directed to represent their case afresh before the Registrar making all averments regarding removal or taking care of the objections which had been raised by the Registrar at the time of passing of the impugned order. 3. Heard Sri R.K.Ojha, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State respondents and Sri Pranav Mishra, learned counsel for the respondent no. 3. 4. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners as no objection made on behalf of learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to file a fresh detailed representation before the respondent no.3 within two weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. After receiving the said representation, respondent no.3 is directed to Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Santosh Kumar Chaubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pranav Mishra Committee Of Management, Madarsa Rasheedul Uloom, Saraiya Varanasi And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) pass a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law after affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioners taking into consideration the submissions as made by learned counsel for the respondent no. 3, expeditiously preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 5. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. September 4, 2025 Pratima WRIC No. 30755 of 2025 2 (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRATIMA AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad