MD. SUKUR ALI @ SHUKUR ALI v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS
WP(C)/1603/2023 · 2025-10-21
Sanjay Kumar Medhi
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9024 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9024 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010052582023
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1603/2023 MD. SUKUR ALI @ SHUKUR ALI S/O- LATE MOSLEM UDDIN SK, VILL- MODATI PART-II, P.O. KHOPATI, P.S.
KAZIGAON, DISTRICT- KOKRAJHAR, ASSAM, PIN- 783339 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS REP. BY COMMISSIONER OF PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, GOVT. OF ASSAM, GHY-37 2:THE BOROLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY BTC KOKRAJHAR ASSAM PIN- 783370 3:THE DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BTC KOKRAJHAR ASSAM PIN- 783370 4:THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER DEVITOLA DEVELOPMENT BLOCK KOKRAJHAR DISTRICT PIN- 783339 5:ABDUL MALEK SK S/O- INNUS ALI SK R/O- VILL- MADATI P.S. KAZIGAON DISTRICT- KOKRAJHAR
Page No.# 2/2 ASSAM PIN- 78333 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR A HUSSAIN, MR M RAHMAN,MD S ALI,I AMIN Advocate for the Respondent : SC, P AND R.D.,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER Date : 22.10.2025
1. Shri. S Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that due to subsequent development as well as efflux of time, there is no existing cause of action to be espoused.
2. Also heard Ms. M Barman, learned State counsel and Shri. S Dutta, learned Standing counsel, P&RD.
3. Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed as not pressed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant