Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9023 (JHR)

NAYAN BARMAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.M.P./929/2020 · 2025-09-11

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[ 2025:JHHC:27993] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI CrMP No. 929 of 2020 1. Nayan Barman, aged about 31 years son of Late Ajoy Barman 2. Namita Barman, aged about 65 years, wife of Late Ajoy Barman Both resident of Bibigram, behind Raj Hotel, Ward No.17, P.S. English Bazar, Ρ.Ο. and District Malda (West Bengal). 3. Aparajita Barman/aged about 45 years, daughter of Late Ajoy Barman, resident of Swami Vivekanand Road, 54/2, P.O. and P.S. Kusumdi, District Howrah (West Bengal). 4. Rupa Barman aged about 40 years, wife of Tanmoy Barman, daughter of Late Ajoy Barman, resdient of Kerani Para, Tiasa Apartment, 4th Floor, P.O. and P.S. Jalpaiguri, Dist. – Jalpaiuri, (Assam). 5. Sangita Barman aged about 38 years, wife of Biswajit Barman, daughter of Late Ajoy Barman, resident of Kotwali, P.S. English Bazar, P.O. and Dist. Malda (West Bengal). 6. Ruma Mandal (Barman) aged about 44 years, wife of Ajit Mandal, daughter of Late Ajoy Barman, resident of Leninpur, P.O. Kadamtala, P.S. Matigora, Dist. Darjeeling (West Bengal). 7. Mithu Sengupta (Barman) aged about 42 years, wife of Sumanta Sengupta, daughter of Late Ajoy Barman, resident of Duttapara, P.S. English Bazar, P.O. and District Malda (West Bengal). … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Laxmi Kumari wife of Nayan Barman, daughter of Virendra Swarnkar, at present residing at village Mirza Chowki, P.O. and P.S. Mirza Chowki, District Sahibganj. … Opp. parties Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Mr. D.K.Chakraverty ,Adv. For the State : Mr. Pankaj Addl. PP. 09 / 11.09.2025 Heard the parties. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners seeks permission of the court to withdraw this petition with a liberty to raise all the grounds mentioned in the petition before appropriate court at appropriate stage. Prayer is allowed. Accordingly, this criminal miscellaneous petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Dated 11.09.2025 Smita/-