Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9023 (GAU)

AMARESH KR RAY v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

I.A.(Crl.)/229/2025 · 2025-03-09

Mridul Kumar Kalita

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010051992025 2025:GAU-AS:2575 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/229/2025 AMARESH KR RAY S/O- LATE YOGENDRA RAY, VILL WARD NO 8, BIJITPUR CHAKASTURI, VAISHALI, BIHAR 844509 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : Sidhant Dutta, Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, In Bail Appln. Case No. 126/2025 (D/O) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA ORDER 10.03.2025 1. Heard Mr. S. Dutta, the learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. P.S. Lahkar, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State of Assam. Page No.# 2/2 2. This interlocutory application has been filed by the applicant, namely, Amaresh Kr. Ray, seeking rectification of a typographical error, which has crept in the order dated 20.02.2025, passed by this Court, in Bail Application No. 126/2025. 3. It appears that though the applicant, namely, Amaresh Kr. Ray, was allowed to go on bail of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only), however, in the order of granting bail, in paragraph No. 25 at line No. 2, the amount of the bail is wrongly mentioned as Rupees Two Lakhs in words. 4. Same needs to be rectified, as same appears to be inadvertent typographical mistake. 5. Accordingly, this interlocutory application is allowed. 6. The words “Rupees Two Lakhs” appearing in line No. 2 of paragraph No 25, of the order dated dated 20.02.2025, in Bail Application No. 126/2025 shall be read as “Rupees One Lakh“only. 7. With the above observations, this interlocutory application is accordingly disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant