IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.2029 of 2025 ------ 1. Memul Ansari @ Nemul Ansari, aged about 22 years, 2. Shyamul Haque, aged about 47 years, Both sons of Murshid Miyan, resident of Village Kuruwa, P.O. Kuruwa, P.S. Karmatanr, District Jamtara (Jharkhand) .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Bhaiya V. Kumar, Advocate Mr. Pranabesh Kr. Paul, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ajay Kr. Pathak, Addl.P.P For the Informant : Mr. Avilash Kumar, Advocate ------ Order No.02 Dated- 27-03-2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending their arrest in connection with Karmatanr P.S. Case No.147 of 2024 instituted under Sections 64, 303 (2) of the B.N.S., 2023, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioner No.1 being assisted by the petitioner No.2, has committed rape upon the informant/victim and committed theft of valuables. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards Annexure-2 page-15-17 of the brief which is the copy of the certified copy of the joint compromise petition filed by the parties in the court of Sessions Judge, Jamtara in A.B.P. No.84 of 2025, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the informant jointly submit that therein it has been mentioned that the parties have compromised the matter outside the court and during the pendency of the case, the informant has solemnized marriage with the petitioner No.1. Learned counsel for the petitioners next submits that the informant was a widow at the time of institution of the case and was in love with the petitioner No.1. It is next submitted that because of some misunderstanding, this case was instituted against the petitioners. It is then submitted that the petitioners undertake that they will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners undertake to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrendering, they will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.10,000/- each as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Jamtara in connection with Karmatanr P.S. Case No.147 of 2024 with the condition that they will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish their mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the pendency of the case and they will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/