[2025:RJ-JP:9406] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3100/2025 Dinesh Kumar Son Of Late Shri Banshidhar Verma, Aged About 50 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 20, Heera Nagar Road, Opposite Krishna Garden, Neema Ka Thana, District Sikar (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Education Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 3. District Education Officer, Elementary Education, Alwar Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Kumar Saini For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 04/03/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner could not refute that the petitioner would be covered under the definition of ‘government servant’, as prescribed under Section 2(c) of Rajasthan Civil Services (Service Matters Appellate Tribunals) Act 1976 (for short “Act of 1976”), nor could the learned counsel for the petitioner refute that the lis in question also falls under the ‘service matters’, as defined under Section 2(f) of the Act of 1976. In view thereof, since the petitioner has an alternative and efficacious remedy available in law, the learned counsel for the petitioner has prayed that the present petition may be disposed of [2025:RJ-JP:9406] (2 of 2) [CW-3100/2025] with a liberty to approach the Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal (for short “RAT”) for redressal of his grievance. Considering the oral prayer, the present petition stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the RAT for redressal of his grievance. If the petitioner files appropriate petition before the learned RAT within a period of 30 days, the RAT shall adjudicate the same on merits pronto, preferably within a period of three months. It is made clear that the present adjudication, shall not effect the case of the petitioner before the learned RAT. Registry of the RAT is directed to comply with the directions spelled out in SBCWP No. 2335/2025 titled as Mohammad Kasif vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. The writ petition stands disposed of in above terms. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/134