HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 28715 of 2024 Court No. - 89 HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J. 1. The case is taken up on mentioning. 2. Heard Sri Abhishek Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicants, Ms. Bhawana Mishra, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Bhuvnesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 and Sri O. P. Singh, learned AGA for the State-opposite party no.1. 3. This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred with prayer to quash the entire proceeding of Session Trial No.917 of 2013(State Vs. Aarif and another), arising out of Case Crime No.1613 of 2012, under sections 436, 504, IPC, Police Station Loni, District Ghqaziabad, pending before learned Additional Session Judge, Court No.12, District Ghaziabad, as well as impugned charge sheet dated 11.10.2012 and impugned cognizance order dated 21.12.2012, passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.01, District Ghaziabad and all consequential effect and orders, on the basis of compromise. 4. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicants that applicants and opposite party no.2 have entered into compromise and the said compromise has already been verified by the learned court concerned and a report regarding verification of compromise sent by the court concerned is already on the record. Learned counsel for the applicants further prays that in view of the compromise entered into between the applicants and opposite party Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Abhishek Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Bhuvnesh Kumar Singh, G.A. Aarif And Another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) no.2, the proceeding of the aforesaid case be quashed. 5. On the other hand, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and learned AGA for the State have no objection to the above submissions made by learned counsel for the applicants. 6. In view of the fact that applicants and opposite party no.2 have entered into compromise and the said compromise has already been verified by the learned court concerned and a report regarding verification of compromise is already on the record and taking note of the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Laxmi Narayan and others, AIR 2019 SC 1296 and the facts of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed, in respect of the applicants. 7. In view of the aforesaid, the entire proceeding of Session Trial No.917 of 2013(State Vs. Aarif and another), arising out of Case Crime No.1613 of 2012, under sections 436, 504, IPC, Police Station Loni, District Ghqaziabad, pending before learned Additional Session Judge, Court No.12, District Ghaziabad, as well as impugned charge sheet dated 11.10.2012 and impugned cognizance order dated 21.12.2012, passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.01, District Ghaziabad and all consequential effect and orders, are hereby quashed. 8. The application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is hereby allowed. September 11, 2025 VKG A482 No. 28715 of 2024 2 (Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIJAY KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad