AAFREEN AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 5 OTHERS
WRIC/29864/2025 · 2025-09-07
Saurabh Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 90202 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 90202 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 29864 of 2025 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
2. By way of the present writ petition, a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in peaceful marital life of petitioners, has been sought.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that both the petitioners are resident of Uttar Pradesh, but for their livelihood, they are presently rendering their services at Dehradun (Uttarakhand).
4. In view of the above, no cause of action arises in favour of the petitioners for seeking protection with regard to solemnization of their marriage in State of Uttar Pradesh, since both the petitioners are rendering their services for their livelihood at Dehradun (Uttarakhand) and as such, the prayer cannot be exceeded as mentioned in the instant petition.
5. In view thereof, present petition stands dismissed. September 8, 2025 #Vik/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashish Kumar Gaur Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Aafreen And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIKRAM GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad