SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA1/1225/2025 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Mohd. Allauddin, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. Pankaj Joshi, learned AGA for the State. 3. Present applicant “Ravi Kashyap, son of Shri Rajpal Singh,” is praying for regular bail in relation to First Information Report dated 06.06.2025 bearing FIR No. 607 of 2025, P.S. Laksar, District Haridwar wherein the applicant has been implicated for the offences punishable under Sections 8 / 22 of NDPS Act. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated and the alleged contraband which is shown to be recovered from the applicant is non commercial quantity and there is no proper substantial compliance of Section 42 (1), 50, 57 and 52A of NDPS Act and even there is no compliance of Section 103 (4) of BNS Act. He further submits that there is one criminal case of the similar nature arising out of Case Crime No. 554 of 2025 against the applicant in which he is already bailed out. 5. On the other side, Mr. Pankaj Joshi, learned A.G.A. have not disputed this fact that the contraband which is shown to be recovered from the applicant is below commercial quantity and in Case Crime No. 554 of 2025 applicant is already bailed out however, he denied that there is no proper compliance of mandatory provision of the NDPS Act. 6. After hearing the arguments of learned counsel for both the parties and further taking into consideration that the contraband, which is shown to be recovered from the applicant is below commercial quantity and in Case Crime No. 554 of 2025 applicant is already bailed out, therefore, this Court is of the view that applicant deserve for bail. 7. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case the bail application is allowed. 8. Let the applicant “Ravi Kashyap, son of Shri Rajpal Singh,” be released on bail on furnishing his personal bond and two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned. 9. It is made clear that after being released on bail if applicant is found to be indulged in any such criminal activities in future prosecution is free to move application for cancellation of bail. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 08.08.2025 SKS