Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010099802025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
WRIT PETITION NO: 5136 of 2025
Bench Sr.No:-LM-1 [3483] Gettini Hari ...Petitioner Vs. M/s. ICICI Bank and others ...Respondents
********** Advocate for Petitioner: Mr. Sai Avinash appearing vice Mr. O. Venkata Raju Advocate for Respondents: -
CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI DATE : 25th February, 2025.
P C :
In view of the availability of an alternative remedy before the Debts Recovery Tribunal, we do not find it a fit case to invoke our extra-ordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, considering the ratio of the judgments of the Apex Court in Radha Krishan Industries v. State of Himachal Pradesh [(2021) 6 SCC 771] and United Bank of India v. Satyawati Tondon [(2010) 8 SCC 110].
2 HCJ & RCJ WP_5136_2025
The present Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. No order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, in this petition, shall stand closed.
DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CJ.
RAVI CHEEMALAPATI, J. SSN