Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:9501] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2967/2025 Vakil S/o Chhuttan, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Baira Ki Bas, Udki Nirbhaya, Police Station Sikri, District Deeg, (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Surendra Singh For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. Anoop Kumar for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order 03/03/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.22/2025 registered at Police Station Deeg, District Deeg for the offences punishable under Sections 303(2), 308(2), 313, 317(5), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) & 61(2)(a) of BNS and Section 66D of I.T. Act.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. It is submitted that dispute has been resolved by the parties amicably. Learned counsel contends that petitioner is in custody since 01.02.2025. Further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. Trial will take time in its conclusion.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by
[2025:RJ-JP:9501] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2967/2025] counsel for the petitioner.
4.
Learned counsel appearing for the complainant does not dispute the factum of compromise.
5. I have considered the contentions.
6. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, as also considering the fact that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; parties have resolved their dispute amicably, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application.
7. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Vakil S/o Chhuttan, shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /404