Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9018 (MAD)

V.V.PADMANABAN v. THE TAHSILDAR

WP/12786/2025 · 2026-07-20

Krishnan Ramasamy

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 12786 of 2025 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 20-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 12786 of 2025 V.V.Padmanaban S/o.V.S.Vishwanathan, Building 2, Flat No.3, Pratik Nagar, Yerwada, Pune -411 006. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Tahsildar Chengalpattu Taluk Office, Chengalpattu District-603 001. 2. The Sub Collector Sub Collector Office, Chengalpattu District-603 111 ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of writ of mandamus for considering the petitioner’s representation dated 14.11.2024 to correct the survey No. as 2142 as it is wrongly marked in FMB Sketch as survey No.2143/1A, 1B For Petitioner(s): Mr.Manikandan.B (No appearance) For Respondent(s): Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, Government Counsel Order This Writ Petition has been filed to correct the survey Number of the petitioner’s land as it is wrongly marked in FMB Sketch by considering the petitioner’s representation dated 14.11.2024. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 12786 of 2025 __________ Page2 of 4 2. The case of the petitioner is that he purchased a property at Plot No. 65, Lakshmi Nagar, Palur Village, Chengalpattu Taluk, Chengalpattu District, measuring an extent of 2,000 sq.ft. Upon verification of the registered title deeds, it was revealed that a significant portion of the petitioner’s land, measuring 1,194 sq.ft., was incorrectly recorded under S.F.No. 2143/1A1B instead of the correct S.F.No. 2142. The petitioner submitted a detailed representation dated 14.11.2024 requesting the authorities to take necessary steps to rectify the said typographical error in the revenue records. As the said representation has not been considered to date, the petitioner has been constrained to approach this Court. 3. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 4. However, the learned Government Counsel appearing for the respondents would submit that the petitioner’s representation dated 14.11.2024 will be disposed of by the 1st respondent within a period of four weeks. 4. Heard the learned Government Counsel for the respondents and also perused the materials available on record. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 12786 of 2025 __________ Page3 of 4 5. In view of the above, this Court directs the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 14.11.2024 on its own merits and dispose of the same in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 6. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 20-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No SK To 1. The Tahsildar Chengalpattu Taluk Office, Chengalpattu District-603 001. 2. The Sub Collector Sub Collector Office, Chengalpattu District-603 111 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 12786 of 2025 __________ Page4 of 4 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. sk WP No. 12786 of 2025 20-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis