2025:JHHC:26277 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Contempt Case (Civil) No. 424 of 2025 1. Anand Toppo, aged about 66 years, Son of Late Atawa Toppo, Resident of Village Pokhar Toli, P.O. Hinoo, P.S. Airport, District-Ranchi, State- Jharkhand. 2. Rabindra Kachhap, aged about 64 years, Son of Late Kolha Oraon, Resident of Village Khokhma Toli, P.O. Hinoo, P.S. Airport, District- Ranchi, State-Jharkhand. 3. Bablu Lohar, aged about 37 years, Son of Late Bano Lohar, Resident of Village Pokhar Toli, P.O. Hinoo, P.S. Airport, District- Ranchi, State- Jharkhand. 4. George Linda, aged about 63 years, Son of Late Silas Linda, Resident of Village Khokhma Toli, P.O. Hinoo, P.S. Airport, District-Ranchi, State- Jharkhand. 5. Mangal Minj, aged about 61 years, Son of Late Thale Minj, Resident of Village Pokhar Toli, P.O. Hinoo, P.S. Airport, District- Ranchi, State- Jharkhand. 6. Gango Devi, aged about 57 years, Son of Late Loda Oraon, Resident of Village Kudloung, P.O. Balalaunge, P.S. Nagri, District-Ranchi, State- Jharkhand. 7. Manish Kujur, aged about 27 years, Son of Deodeep Kujur, Resident of Village Khokhma Toli, P.O. Hinoo, P.S. Airport, District-Ranchi, State- Jharkhand. ... … Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Sri Manjunath Bhajantri, Son of not known to the petitioner, The Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali, District Ranchi. … … Opposite Party(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Dubey, Advocate For the Opposite Party(s) : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Roy, AC to GA-III -------- Order No. 4 /Dated: 29th August 2025 The instant contempt case has been filed by the petitioners alleging willful disobedience and deliberate violation of the order dated 25.11.2024 passed in W.P.(C) No. 4487 of 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that pursuant to the 2025:JHHC:26277 2 order dated 25.11.2024 passed in W.P.(C) No. 4487 of 2023 though a so-called reasoned order has been passed which is annexed as Annexure-D to the show cause filed on 15.07.2025, however, the document has not been given along with the reasoned order. As such, learned counsel prays that the instant contempt case may be disposed of by giving liberty to the petitioners to approach the concerned opposite party for getting the said document. 3. Having regard to the aforesaid facts and circumstances coupled with the fact that a reasoned order vide Annexure-D filed on 15.07.2025 to the show cause has been passed, this contempt case is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to approach the concerned opposite party for redressal of their grievance, if so advised. (Deepak Roshan, J.) Amit