Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9017 (GAU)

BINOD KUMAR PAUL AND ANR v. SUMIT SATTAWAN

Cont.Cas(C)/139/2024 · 2025-07-24

Sanjay Kumar Medhi

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010052382024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/139/2024 BINOD KUMAR PAUL AND ANR S/O SRI RAJENDRA PAUL, R/O GMC HOUSE NO. 243 B, VILLAGE NO. 1, HENGRABARI, GUWAHATI-781036 2: PROMOD CH. BORA @ PRANAB CH. BORAH S/O GUNANHIRAM BORAH R/O VILLAGE NO. 1 HENGRABARI GUWAHATI-78103 VERSUS SUMIT SATTAWAN THE DISTRICT/DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, KAMRUP (M), GUWAHATI Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N H MAZARBHUIYAN, S SOHAIL,MR. A Y CHOUDHURY,MR. T A CHOUDHURY Advocate for the Respondent : M BRAHMA (R-1), MR. S R BORUAH (R-1),MS. B DEKA (R-1) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER 25.07.2025 None appears for the petitioners on call whereas Shri S.R. Boruah, learned counsel appears for the sole respondent. Page No.# 2/2 Shri Boruah, learned counsel has submitted that he has received written instructions dated 24.07.2025 along with a copy of the order dated 14.08.2024 from which it appears that the representation of the petitioners filed in connection with Mission Basundhra 2.O has been disposed of. It is seen that the order dated 23.08.2023 passed in WP(C)/4833/2023 was on the aspect of consideration and disposal of the representation. It appears that the order of this Court has been substantially complied with. In view of the above, the contempt petition is closed. Copy of the orders dated 24.07.2025 and 14.08.2024 are made part of the records. JUDGE Comparing Assistant