Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 90159 (ALL)

JITENDRA KUMAR AND 9 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIC/29035/2024 · 2025-01-22

Ashwani Kumar Mishra, Donadi Ramesh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:10682-DB Court No. - 29 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 29035 of 2024 Petitioner :- Jitendra Kumar And 9 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Krishna Sharma,Sumit Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Donadi Ramesh,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned State Counsel for the State-respondents. The petitioners want action against Pradhan of the village for alleged embezzlement. The particular nature of grievance raised can always be examined by the District Magistrate provided that a complaint is made in terms of Rule 3 of the UP Panchayat Raj (Removal of Pradhans, Up-Pradhan and Members) Enquiry Rules, 1997. The writ petition would not lie for such purpose. Leaving it open to the petitioners to approach the competent forum in respect of grievance raised, the writ petition is consigned to the records. Order Date :- 22.1.2025 rkg Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad