APHC010099112015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 9192/2015 Between: 1. ROSE RANI NAKKA, W/O ADAM RAJ DEKKAPATI, R/A D NO. 10- 64/2, WOLVERTANPETA, AKIVIDU, W.G. DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE UNION OF INDIA, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS, NEW DELHI. 2. THE REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICER, MURALI NAGAR, NEAR BY PASS CENTRE, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus declaring the action on the part of the 2nd Respondent in not correcting the date of birth of the petitioner as 03-05-1957 instead of 05- 03-1963 in the passport No.K 8908953 as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the passport Act 1967 and violative of the Fundamental rights under article 14 and 19 of the Constitution of the India and consequently direct the 2nd Respondent to correct the date of birth of the petitioner as 03-05-1957 instead of 05-03-1963 in the passport No.K 8908953 pending disposal of the above writ petition. IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 12112 OF 2015 2 JS,J W.P.No.9192/2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd Respondent to correct the date of birth of the petitioner as 03-05- 1957 instead of 05-03-1963 in the passport No. K 8908953 pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A S C BOSE Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA The Court made the following 3 JS,J W.P.No.9192/2015 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 12.08.2025 KAS