RAMESH CHANDRA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/30144/2025 · 2025-09-22
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 90147 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 90147 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 30144 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
1. Supplementary affidavit filed today in Court is taken on record.
2. The report of the Sub-Divisional Officer, Chail, District Kaushambi has come, which is taken on record.
3. From the perusal of the report, it appears that proceedings under Section 24 was initiated by the petitioner against one Ram Kailash and others. The said proceedings had concluded and the demarcation proceedings were carried out and the pillars were affixed.
4. Now, the petitioner after the affixation of the pillars has filed the present writ petition claiming the chakmarg which is on the eastern side. In case, the petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed under Section 24 which is proceedings initiated by him, he could file an appeal under Section 24(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.
5. The writ petition filed for the relief as claimed cannot be granted. This petition misconceived and stands dismissed. September 23, 2025 A. V. Singh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dileep Kumar, Gopal Khare, Mahendra Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : Azad Rai, C.S.C. (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Ramesh Chandra And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AJAY VIKRAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad