Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 90109 (ALL)

M/S MANISH KUMAR SADAIYA GOVERNMENT CONTRACTOR AND SUPPLIER THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR MANISH KUMAR SAD v. STATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/30228/2025 · 2025-09-09

Amitabh Kumar Rai, Saral Srivastava

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 30228 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. The grievance of the petitioners is that the respondent authority has not released the payment due to the petitioners' firm, along with interest, within the stipulated period for the work executed by the petitioners' firm under the work orders dated 10.05.2019 and 23.04.2020. In respect to his grievances, petitioners have submitted several representations to the respondent-authority, but respondent-authority is not paying any heed to the request of the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and appropriate direction may be issued to the respondent no. 3 to consider the grievance of the petitioner. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without adverting into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed off permitting the petitioner to file a fresh representation along with certified copy of this order raising all his grievances before the respondent No. 3 Executive Engineer, Jhansi Division Jal Sansthan Lalitpur within a period of one month from today. In case, any such Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prashant Agrawal, Premnendra Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Shri Ram Pandey M/S Manish Kumar Sadaiya Government Contractor And Supplier Through Its Proprietor Manish Kumar Sadaiya .....Petitioner(s) State Of Up And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) representation is filed by the petitioners, the respondent no. 3 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law and after giving due notice and opportunity of hearing to the petitioner within a period of two months thereafter from the date he receives the representation of the petitioner. September 10, 2025 Sumaira WRIC No. 30228 of 2025 2 (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUMAIRA AQUIL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SUMAIRA AQUIL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SUMAIRA AQUIL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad