Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 90106 (ALL)

SMT. ROHINEE AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/29642/2025 · 2025-09-07

Saurabh Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 29642 of 2025 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents. 2. By means of the present writ petition, a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in peaceful marital life of petitioners, has been sought. 3. As per submission of learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel, age of the petitioner no.2 is not marriageable and as such no cause of action arises in favour of the petitioners for seeking prayer as prayed through the instant petition. 4. In view of the above, prayer sought through the instant petition cannot be acceded to. 5. Writ petition stands dismissed. September 8, 2025 Rakesh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rakesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Smt. Rohinee And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad