IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.125 Rajpal and others State of Haryana and others CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON'BLE M Present : Mr. R.S. Mamli, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana. DEEPAK SIBAL, J 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of wit No.4-Deputy Commissioner representation dated 2. Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection if the above prayer is accepted. 3. Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction on the representation by passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to concerned, preferably within order. 4. Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the petitioners and if the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. 19.08.2025 Prince Whether speaking/reasoned IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Versus and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. R.S. Mamli, Advocate for the petitioners. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana. * * * * * DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of wit Deputy Commissioner-cum-Collector, Karnal dated 07.05.2022 (Annexure P-5), submitted Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection if the above prayer is accepted. Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. representation dated 07.05.2022 (Annexure P ng a speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to , preferably within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the and if the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-23839-2025 Date of decision : 19.08.2025 .…. Petitioners ..... Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL LAPITA BANERJI Mr. R.S. Mamli, Advocate for the petitioners. submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent Collector, Karnal to take a decision on the ), submitted by the petitioners. Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, to respondent No.4 to take a decision (Annexure P-5), submitted by the petitioners, ng a speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to all from the date of receipt of a copy of this Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the and if the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioners, they would be at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. [DEEPAK SIBAL] JUDGE [LAPITA BANERJI] JUDGE : Yes / No PRINCE SAINI 2025.08.20 21:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document