HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 7224 of 2025 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J. 1. Copy of the statement of co-accused, Arun produced by Sri P.K. Tripathi, learned A.G.A. for the State is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA for the State, and perused the material placed on record. 3. This application has been filed with the prayer to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant in Case Crime No. 116 of 2025, under Sections 190, 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3), 109(1) of B.N.S., Police Station Suroorpur, District Meerut. 4. Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant was not named in the first information report and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The name of the applicant was disclosed by co-accused Arun in police custody. The said statement, insofar as it implicates the applicant, is unreliable. In the alleged incident, the injuries sustained by two persons were found simple in nature. No X-ray report as well as supplementary medical report is available in the case diary. The applicant has not committed any robbery. Identically placed co-accused Rishabh has been granted bail, till submission of police report, by this Court vide order dated 06.08.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application No. 6020 of 2025. At this stage, there is no credible evidence to link the applicant with the offence. The criminal history of the applicant has been explained in para no. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mishra Vikas Kumar Prabhunath, Prashant Ji Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Amit .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) 21 of the affidavit. It is next submitted that the investigation is pending and the applicant has apprehension of his arrest in the above mentioned case. 5. Learned AGA opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail but could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record. 6. Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that the application for grant of anticipatory bail be confined only till the submission of police report. 7. Having regard to the submissions made, considering the nature of accusations and the fact that the applicant was not named in the first information report; the name of the applicant was disclosed by the co- accused Arun in police custody; in the alleged incident, the injuries sustained by two persons were found simple in nature; identically placed co-accused Rishabh has been granted bail, till submission of police report, by this Court; at this stage, there is no substantive evidence to link the applicant with the offence, without commenting on merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on anticipatory bail till the submission of police report. 8. In the event of arrest, the applicant- Amit be released on anticipatory bail in the aforesaid case crime till the submission of police report, if any, under Section 193 (3) BNSS, on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; (iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if he has passport, the same shall be deposited by him before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned. 8. In default of any of the conditions, the Investigating Officer is at liberty to NABAIL No. 7224 of 2025 2 file appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the applicant. 9. The Investigating Officer is directed to conclude the investigation of the present case in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this order independently without being prejudiced by any observation made by this Court while considering and deciding the present anticipatory bail application of the applicant. 10. The applicant is directed to produce a copy of this order before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned within ten days from today, who shall ensure the compliance of present order. 11. The application stands disposed of. September 17, 2025 Sachin Mishra NABAIL No. 7224 of 2025 3 (Vivek Varma,J.) Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad