Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 90099 (KAR)

SRI H N SHIVASHANKARA v. KOMALA

RFA/89/2024 · 2025-10-31

Anu Sivaraman, Vijaykumar A Patil

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43764-DB RFA No. 89 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.89 OF 2024 (PAR) BETWEEN: SRI H N SHIVASHANKARA S/O LATE NANJEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, RESIDING AT HERAGU VILLAGE, DUDDA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK AND DISTRICT 573201 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. NARENDRA GOWDA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. KOMALA AGED ABOUT MAJOR, W/O MOGANNAGOWDA, H B THIMMAPPA (2ND HUSBAND) RESIDING AT TANNIRUHALLA, PARSHWANATH, NEAR RICE MIKLL, B M ROAD, HASSAN 573201. 2. PRAMILA D/O LATE MOGANNAGOWDA, Digitally signed by CHANNEGOWDA PREMA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43764-DB RFA No. 89 of 2024 AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, RESIDING AT TANNIRUHALLA, S MARIYAPPA VATTARA, B M ROAD, (FOREST GATE) HASSAN 573201. 3. KUMAREGOWDA S/O LATE SANNEGOWDA S AGED MAJOR, RESIDING AT MARIYAPPA VATTARA, B M ROAD, HASSAN 573201. 4. SMT. JAVARAMMA D/O LATE SANNEGOWDA, (DEAD), (PRINTED AS PER THE ORDER DATED 17-9-2019) PAPAMMA, D/O LATE SANNEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, RESIDING AT S MARIYAPPA VATTARA, TANNIRUHALLA, HASSAN 573201. …RESPONDENTS THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 21.11.2023 PASSED IN O.S.NO.20/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, HASSAN, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43764-DB RFA No. 89 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) The order dated 12.09.2024 reads as under; "At request, finally, two weeks' time is granted to do the needful, failing which appeal shall stand dismissed." 2. Till today, office objections are not complied. Therefore, in view of the peremptory order dated 12.09.2024 passed by this Court, no further order is required. 3. Accordingly, appeal stands dismissed. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE PN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 25