Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 90080 (ALL)

SAIM AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

CRLP/19210/2025 · 2025-09-25

Santosh Rai, Siddharth

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 19210 of 2025 Court No. - 47 HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J. HON'BLE SANTOSH RAI, J. 1. Short counter affidavit filed today in Court on behalf of respondent no.3 is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners; Sri Prashant Kumar Dubey, learned counsel for respondent no.3 and learned AGA for the State-respondents. 3. The present writ petition has been preferred with the prayer to quash the impugned First Information Report dated 19.6.2025, registered as Case Crime No.0287 of 2025, under Sections- 115(2), 352, 351(3) of B.N.S., Police Station- Kithaur, District- Meerut and for a direction to the respondents not to arrest the petitioners in pursuance of impugned First Information Report. 4. Learned counsel for respondent no.3 submits that the parties have settled their dispute outside the court and respondent no.3 has no objection in case the impugned FIR is quashed. 5. Accordingly, the impugned FIR alongwith all the consequential proceedings are hereby quashed. 6. The writ petition is allowed. 7. Investigating officer of this case is directed to make entry of this compromise in the case diary. 8. Let this order be communicated to the S.S.P., Meerut, by the Registrar (Compliance) within 10 days. September 26, 2025 RA Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anand Prakash Dubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Prashant Kumar Dubey, G.A. (Santosh Rai,J.) (Siddharth,J.) Saim And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAZIQ ALI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad