Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 3093 of 2025 Court No. - 83 HON'BLE SHEKHAR KUMAR YADAV, J. 1.Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2.By means of this application, the only prayer made by the applicant is that a direction be issued to the learned Additional Court Varanasi to decide the Complaint Case old No. 2101 of 2014 and new no. 1916 of 2017, (Kanhaiya Lal Yadav Vs. Sachin Jaiswal) under Section 138 N.I Act, P.S. Luxa, District Varanasi in some stipulated period.
3. I do not find any ground to pass such order looking to the fact that number of cases are pending before the trial court waiting for its logical conclusion and in the circumstances, no such direction can be issued to decide a particular case within a stipulated time. However, it is expected that the court below shall consider and decide of the matter pending before it in accordance with law without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties as expeditiously as possible.
4. With the aforesaid, the present application stands dismissed. September 1, 2025 A. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ashwini Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.) Kanhaiya Lal Yadav .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- AFAQ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad