Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.302 of 2025 ====================================================== Vipin @ Bipin Kumar S/o Sri Surendra Kumar @ Surendra Kumar Singh resident of village and P.O Simuara, P.S Tekari, District Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Add. Chief Secretary Department of Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Director Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Collector Gaya.
4. The District Education Officer, Gaya
5. The District Program Officer (estb.) Gaya
6. The Bihar School Examination Board, Budha Marga, Patna, through its Secretary, Patna.
7. The Chairman, Bihar School Examination Board Patna, Budha Marga, Patna,
8. The Governing Body, Inter Mahila College Tekari, Gaya through its Chairman Sri Birendra Kumar Singh, District Gaya.
9. Birendra Kumar Singh, Chairman Inter Mahila College Tekari, Gaya father's name not known, Professor S.N.Sinha College Tekari, presently residing at Village and P.O Eguna, P.S Tekari, District Gaya.
10. Ghanshyam Kumar Awasthi, Incharge Principal cum Secretary, Governing Body Inter Mahila College Tekari, Gaya.
11. Indian Bank, Branch Jamuniatola Branch, Churi (Gaya) District Gaya, through its Branch Manager, Gaya. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bijay Kumar Pandey, Adv. For the State : Mrs. Puspanjali Sharma, AC to SC20 For the B.S.E.B. : Mr. Naresh Dikshit, Adv. : Ms. Kalpana, Adv. For the Respondent No.11: Mr. Nishi Nath Ojha, Adv. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 2 27-03-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the respondents.
2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ application
Patna High Court CWJC No.302 of 2025(2) dt.27-03-2025 2/2 with a liberty to file an appeal before appropriate authority.
3. Permission is granted.
4. Accordingly, this application stands disposed of as withdrawn, with a liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal for appropriate authority with four weeks from today and the concerned authority is directed to pass a reasoned and speaking
order, after hearing the parties.
anand/- (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) U