Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 90063 (KAR)

M/S AROVEA PINNACLE PVT LTD v. M/S. PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK

WP/6788/2023 · 2025-10-15

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40777 WP No. 6788 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 6788 OF 2023 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. M/S AROVEA PINNACLE PVT LTD FLAT NO S001, NO.41, 2ND FLOOR, 18TH MAIN, JAYANAGAR 4TH 'T' BLOCK BENGALURU - 560041 REPT BY ITS DIRECTORS. SREELAKSHMI H N 2. SREELAKSHMI H N W/O VARUN KUMAR M N 3. VARUN KUMAR M N S/O M S NIRANJAN, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, PETITIONERS NO.2 AND 3 ARE R/AT FLAT NO.S001, NO 451, 2ND FLOOR, 18TH MAIN, JAYANAGAR 4TH 'T' BLOCK BENGALURU - 560041. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. MANJUNATHA H.B., ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: 1. M/S. PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK 26-27, RAHEA TOWERS Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40777 WP No. 6788 of 2023 M G ROAD (1ST FLOOR), BENGALURU - 560001. REPT BY ITS MANAGER/AUTHORISED OFFICER. 2. M/S. PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK JAYANAGAR BRANCH NO 451, GROUND FLOOR, 18TH MAIN, JAYANAGAR 4TH 'T; BLOCK BENGALURU - 560041 REPT BY ITS MANAGER/AUTHORISED OFFICER. 3. M/S LINEA PROPERTIES HAVING REGD OFFICE AT NO 77, 1ST FLOOR, BRINDAVAN LAYOUT, 2ND STAGE, DODDABELE ROAD, KENGERI, BENGALURU 560060 BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS REPT BY ITS PARTNERS MR K N NARENDRAN AND MR L DINESH KUMAR …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO STAY THE PUBLIC AUCTION TO BE HELD ON 24.03.2023 ACCOUNT NO.128700IL00000058, 1287008700000960 VIDE ANNEXURE-A IN RESPECT OF THE FLAT NO.S001, NO.451, 2ND FLOOR, 18TH MAIN, JAYANAGAR 4TH 'T' BLOCK, BENGALURU - 560041. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40777 WP No. 6788 of 2023 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER No representation on behalf of the petitioners. The office objections have not been complied with for the sixth time. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3