K.SELVARAJ v. The District Superintendent of Police,
WP Crl./699/2025 · 2025-08-29
N Sathish Kumar
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 90052 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 90052 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
W.P.Crl.No.699 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 29.08.2025 CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR W.P.Crl.No.699 of 2025 K.Selvaraj ...Petitioner Versus
1. The District Superintendent of Police, O/o. The District Superintendent of Police, Tiruppur District.
2. The Inspector of Police Gudimangalam Police Station, Tiruppur District.
3. Sukumaran District Superintendent of Police, Udumalaipettai Taluk, Tiruppur District.
4. Balamurugan Inspector of police,(Incharge), Gudimanagalam Police Station, Tiruppur District.
5. Thirugnanasambandam Inspector of police, Gudimanagalam Police Station, Tiruppur District.
1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.Crl.No.699 of 2025
6. Venkatachalam Sub Inspector of police,(Incharge), Gudimanagalam Police Station, Tiruppur District. ...Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to dispose the petitioner representation dated 06.01.2025 and initiate suitable proceedings against the respondents 3 to 6 in accordance with law. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Bharathy For Respondents : Mr.R.Vinothraja for R1 and R2 Government Advocate (Criminal Side) O R D E R The petitioner seeks a direction to the 1st respondent police to consider his representation dated 06.01.2025 and take action against the respondents 3 to 6.
2. According to the petitioner, the investigation has not been properly conducted by the alleged personnel, therefore seeks action against them.
3. Heard the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 and perused the documents placed on record.
4. It is relevant to note that the petitioner has already been arrayed as 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.Crl.No.699 of 2025 an accused and if the investigation has not been conducted, as per the Rules, the petitoner can take advantage of the same in the trial and only if there is proper finding by the trial court and in violation of the procedures, action could be initiated.
5. In such view of the matter, based on the representation, action cannot be initiated and the present Petition is dismissed. No costs. 29.08.2025 Neutral Citation:Yes/No ssd To
1. The District Superintendent of Police, O/o. The District Superintendent of Police, Tiruppur District.
2. The Inspector of Police Gudimangalam Police Station, Tiruppur District.
3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.Crl.No.699 of 2025 N. SATHISH KUMAR
, J . W.P.Crl.No.699 of 2025 29.08.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis