HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 7080 of 2025 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J. 1. Heard counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Anupam Anand, learned brief holder for the State and perused the material placed on record. 2. This application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No.219 of 2021, under sections 412, 413 I.P.C., P.S. Bardah, District Azamgarh. 3. Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant was not named in the first information report and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The name of the applicant was disclosed by co-accused Dharmu Gaud, Mohan Banvasi, Sonu Banvasi, Dharmendra and Shiv Prasad in police custody. The said statements, insofar as they implicate the applicant, are unreliable. At this stage, there is no credible evidence to link the applicant with the offence. Investigation has been completed. The applicant had cooperated in the investigation. No custodial interrogation is required. The applicant has been summoned by the concerned Court. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. The applicant has apprehension of his arrest in the above mentioned case. In case, the applicant is granted anticipatory bail, he will not misuse the said liberty. 4. Learned brief holder opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail but could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record. 5. Having regard to the submissions made, considering the nature of Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Saroj Kumar Dubey, Vineet Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ramgopal Jaiswal .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) accusations and antecedents of the applicant and the fact that the applicant was not named in the first information report, the name of the applicant was disclosed by co-accused Dharmu Gaud, Mohan Banvasi, Sonu Banvasi, Dharmendra and Shiv Prasad in police custody, at this stage, there is no credible evidence to link the applicant with the offence, the fact that the applicant had cooperated in the investigation and no custodial interrogation is required, without commenting on merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on anticipatory bail. 6. In the event of arrest, the applicant Ramgopal Jaiswal, involved in the aforesaid case crime be released on anticipatory bail during pendency of trial, on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall make himself available on each and every date fixed in the matter by the court concerned; (ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade from disclosing such facts to the Court; (iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if he has passport, the same shall be deposited by his before the concerned court. 7. In default of any of the conditions, the court concerned is at liberty to pass appropriate orders for enforcing and compelling the same. 8. The application stands disposed of. September 1, 2025 S.S. NABAIL No. 7080 of 2025 2 (Vivek Varma,J.) Digitally signed by :- SIDDHARTH SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad