Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 90047 (KAR)

BHAGYA KUMAR v. THE COMMISSIONER

WP/27295/2018 · 2025-08-01

M I Arun

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29779 WP No. 27295 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO. 27295 OF 2018 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: 1. BHAGYA KUMAR W/O M.P.KRISHNA KUMAR AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/A NO.5 AND 5/1, 6TH CROSS NEAR WATER TANK DEVEGOWDA BLOCK KORAMANGALA MAIN ROAD ADUGODI, BENGALURU-560 030. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. BASAVARAJU N., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. B.RAMESH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER BBMP, NR SQUARE HUDSON CIRCLE BENGALURU-560 002. 2. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BBMP KORAMANGALA SUB-DIVISION 2ND CROSS, 17TH A MAIN 5TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA BENGALURU-560 030. 3. S. ANITHA W/O PUTTASWAMY Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29779 WP No. 27295 of 2018 AGED 40 YEARS R/A NO.5/2, 6TH CROSS ADUGODI, DEVEGOWDA BLOCK BENGALURU-560 030. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. T.M.VENKATA REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2; SRI. C.H.RAMACHANDRA REDDY FOR C/R3, ADVOCATE) THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 27.04.2018 PASSED ON IA NO.IV FILED UNDER ORDER 1 RULE 10(2) OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE R/W UNDER SECTION 13 OF THE REGULARIZATION ACT 1979 IN APPEAL NO.1170/2017 BY THE KARNATAKA APPELLATE TRIBUNAL WHICH IS PRODUCED AND MARKED AS ANEXURE-M AND ALLOW THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BY PERMITTING THE PETITIONER TO PROSECUTE THE PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE APPEALLATE TRIBUNAL AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29779 WP No. 27295 of 2018 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN ORAL ORDER The writ petition is filed against the order passed on I.A.No.IV in Appeal No.1170/2017 by the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal. 2. It is submitted by the parties concerned that the Appeal No.1170/2017 itself has been subsequently disposed by the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal. 3. In the light of the same, the writ petition is hereby dismissed as having become infructuous. SD/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE PGG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 36