C/M S.D. AYURVEDIC PHARMACY COLLEGE G.T. ROAD v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/29697/2025 · 2025-09-10
Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 90043 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 90043 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 29697 of 2025 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking for the following reliefs:-
"(i). Issue a writ, order or direction in nature of mandamus directing the respondent No.4 to forward the result / data of the students before the respondent No. 1 to 3 for
consideration of scholarship. (ii). Issue a writ, order or direction in nature of mandamus directing the respondent No. 1 to 3 to open the portal for submission of result and accepting the scholar ship data and further release the scholarship forthwith."
2. Sri J.K. Tiwari, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.4 - Registrar, Ayurvedic and Unani Tibbi Chikitsha Padhati Board, Lucknow submitted that as per instructions dated 26.06.2025, the result has already been declared. In support of his contention, he has also referred the paragraph nos.4 and 5 of the written instructions.
Learned counsel for respondent no.4 has placed the instructions during the arguments, which is taken on record.
3. Ms.Ainakshi Sharma, learned Standing Counsel appeared on advance accepted notice on behalf of the State-respondent nos.1 to 3 submitted and undertaken that since the result has already been declared by respondent no.4, the State will take proper steps to open the portal for submission of result.
4. Heard Sri Prashant Sharma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Ms. Ainakshi Sharma, learned Standing Counsel appeared on advance accepted notice on behalf of the State-respondent nos.1 to 3, Sri Jai Krishna Tiwari, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.4, the contents made in the writ petition and documents on record.
5. Taking into consideration of the submissions made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State- respondents, I am of the view that no useful purpose would be served to keep the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prashant Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Jai Krishna Tiwari C/M S.D. Ayurvedic Pharmacy College G.T. Road .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
matter pending for further adjudication.
6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with direction to respondent nos. 1 to 3 to open the portal as undertaking given by learned Standing Counsel for the State- respondents, within two weeks, from the date of production of certified copy of this
order, if no other impediment.
September 11, 2025 Pratima WRIC No. 29697 of 2025 2 (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRATIMA AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- PRATIMA AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- PRATIMA AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad