[2025:RJ-JP:8659] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3035/2025 Dr. Ranveer Choudhary, aged about 25 Years, S/o Rajendra Choudhary, Resident of 15, Balanand Ji Ka Rasta, Chandpole Bazar, Jaipur-302001 Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. NEET PG Admission/counselling Board-2024, Through Chairman, SMS Medical College, Jaipur 2. 3. NIIMS Medical College, Though its Principle, NIMS University Jaipur National Medical Commission, through its Secretary Pocket-14, Sector-8, Dwarka Phase-1, New Delhi-110077. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Dr. Abhinav Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Yash Joshi for Mr. Vigyan Shah, AAG Mr. Angard Mirdha HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 27/02/2025 1. An application (SBCMA No. 1/2025) is moved under the provisions of Article 226 of the Constitution of India for impleadment of National Medical Commission in array of respondents in SBCWP No. 3035/2025. 2. For the reasons stated in the memo of application, the same stands allowed. 3. Amended cause title is taken on record. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner was provisionally allotted a seat in NIIMS University under OBC category, qua the faculty of MD, General Medicine, in [2025:RJ-JP:8659] (2 of 3) [CW-3035/2025] the third round of counseling (Annexure-1). Howsoever, the petitioner was unable to deposit the requisite fee within the prescribed time i.e. before 12.02.2025. 5. It is further submitted that due to the fact that the prescribed total fee for the said course is of Rs. 56 lakhs Only however, the petitioner had deposited a sum of Rs.50 lakhs Only (on 21.02.2025), the name of the petitioner was reflected as ‘no show candidate’. 6. At this nascent juncture, counsel representing the respondent No.1 has apprised this Court with the fact that as on date one seat is lying vacant. 7. Considering the foregoing facts and circumstances of the case and taking note of the fact that no third party rights are created vis-a-vis the said seat this Court is of the view that merely due to non-disposition of a part-fee the candidature of the petitioner, especially when a seat is lying vacant and no third party rights are created, ought not be ousted. 8. In light of the above, this Court directs the respondents to consider the candidature of the petitioner as per the merit scored by him as stated in Annexure-1 vis-a-vis the vacant seat of MD, General Medicine. 9. The petitioner is directed to carry out the necessary formalities by tomorrow i.e. 28.02.2025, while appearing before the competent authority at or around 10:00 A.M. 10. Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of with aforementioned directions. It is made clear that the present judgment is passed considered the distinct and extraordinary [2025:RJ-JP:8659] (3 of 3) [CW-3035/2025] circumstances of the matter, and shall not be treated as a precedence. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/s-599