DEVI SINGH S/O SHREE SUGAN SINGH v. GOVIND LAL MANDHANA S/O LATE SHRI RATANLAL MANDHANA
CRLMP/1229/2025 · 2025-04-21
Sameer Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9002 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9002 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:16665] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1229/2025 Devi Singh S/o Shree Sugan Singh, R/o Panchayat Samiti Quarter Ke Pas, Smabarlake, District Jaipur (Raj). ----Petitioner Versus
1. Govind Lal Mandhana S/o Late Shri Ratanlal Mandhana, R/o Sambarlake, District Jaipur (Raj).
2. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Public Prosecutor. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Lovesh Mamnani for Mr. Anshuman Saxena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP with Mr. Subham Sain, AAAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment 21/04/2025 After arguing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw the present petition however has payed that no prejudice be caused to the petitioner on account of said withdrawal and that time granted by the Court qua deposition of 20 per cent amount be extended, therefore a reasonable time is prayed for deposition of 20 per cent amount. Considering the foregoing facts and circumstances of the case and taking note of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court extends the time period by 20 days qua compliance of the directions passed in the impugned
order.
[2025:RJ-JP:16665] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-1229/2025] It is made clear that no prejudice be caused qua the petitioner on account of the said withdrawal, to the proceedings before learned Trial Court. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/101